Most founders talk about Google Ads as a channel.
That framing is already a mistake.
Channels are additive.
They scale linearly.
They fail quietly.
Google Ads does none of that.
Google Ads is a liability.
And like any liability, it must be governed, protected, and actively constrained.
Why the “Channel” Framing Is Dangerous
When something is treated as a channel:
-
It is expected to grow
-
It is measured by surface metrics
-
It is delegated without full ownership
That mindset works for content.
It does not work for bidding systems tied directly to margin.
Google Ads compounds risk faster than it compounds returns.
Every Mature Account Carries Hidden Risk
In early stages, Google Ads feels simple.
-
Add spend
-
See demand
-
Capture revenue
In mature accounts, the equation changes.
Risk accumulates through:
-
Automation creep
-
Signal dilution
-
Platform-incentivized changes
-
Loss of structural intent
The account still “runs.”
But the downside grows quietly.
That is liability behavior.
Platforms Optimize for Themselves
This is not controversial.
It is structural.
Platforms optimize for:
-
Spend expansion
-
Feature adoption
-
Reduced friction to budget increases
They do not optimize for:
-
Margin protection
-
Explainability
-
Long-term predictability
When founders delegate judgment to platforms, liability shifts back onto the business.
Usually unnoticed.
Until it matters.
Optimization Is Often Risk Transfer
Most “optimizations” are framed as improvements.
In reality, many of them:
-
Trade control for convenience
-
Trade visibility for scale
-
Trade intent for volume
The risk does not disappear.
It moves.
Usually onto the founder.
Why Agencies Increase Exposure
Agencies are incentivized to keep accounts active and agreeable.
That means:
-
Fewer hard no’s
-
More compliance with recommendations
-
More movement than restraint
This does not make agencies bad.
It makes them unsuitable for managing liabilities.
What Liability Management Actually Looks Like
When Google Ads is treated correctly, the focus shifts.
From growth to:
-
Risk containment
-
Intent isolation
-
Decision traceability
-
Downside-first thinking
Changes become deliberate.
Automation becomes selective.
Stability becomes a goal.
That is governance, not growth hacking.
The Question Founders Should Ask
Not:
“How do we scale this channel?”
But:
“What risk does this system introduce if left unchecked?”
If no one can answer that clearly, the liability is already unmanaged.
The Line That Matters
Google Ads will always be powerful.
That does not make it safe.
Treating it like a channel creates blind spots.
Treating it like a liability restores control.
Founders who understand this stop chasing performance and start protecting the business.
That is where predictability comes from.
0 Comments