SEO founders are usually good operators.
They understand systems.
They respect specialization.
They outsource Google Ads for the right reason.
That decision is rational.
Outsourcing it to an agency is not.
The Issue Is Not Skill. It’s Structure.
Agencies are designed to manage activity, not ownership.
Their incentives reward:
-
Execution
-
Consistency
-
Platform compliance
-
Visible optimization
Google Ads at scale requires:
-
Judgment
-
Restraint
-
Intent protection
-
Clear accountability
Those incentives do not align.
SEO Logic Does Not Transfer Cleanly to Paid Search
SEO optimizes for coverage and accumulation.
Paid search optimizes for isolation and control.
When agencies blend the two:
-
Intent collapses
-
Structures flatten
-
Predictability erodes
The account may still perform.
It just becomes fragile.
That fragility compounds over time.
Why Agencies Rely on Platforms
Agencies normalize platform recommendations to reduce risk.
That shifts decision-making away from the account.
Changes become harder to explain.
No one clearly owns the outcome.
This is not negligence.
It is how agency models stay scalable.
The Cost Founders Actually Feel
Not higher CPA.
Loss of:
-
Confidence
-
Explainability
-
Control when scaling
At that point, growth feels dangerous.
When Outsourcing Does Work
Only when:
-
One operator owns decisions
-
Judgment is not delegated
-
Systems are protected, not constantly changed
That model is rare in agencies.
The Line SEO Founders Should Draw
Agencies manage processes.
Google Ads requires ownership.
If no one can clearly explain why decisions are made, the system is already compromised.
That is why SEO founders should not outsource Google Ads to agencies.
0 Comments